Um, Mr. President, I was wondering if you could answer a question for me. See this has been bothering me and I thought, you, being so intelligent could explain it. Your ads are saying that Mr. Romney made his money by bankrupting companies and laying off the employees. And I heard you say that this was going to be a central part of your campaign.
So what I want to know is this. How do you take over companies, bankrupt them and lay off the employees and make a profit? I mean, I'd really like to know because then I could get rich this way too. I could accomplish the bankrupting part and I could probably hire someone to do the dirty work of laying off people. But how do you make money doing that? Could Romney have actually become a wealthy man this way? Isn't the first order of business in a bankruptcy that the court takes control from all the owners and appoints a trustee who may arrange for a new management, but former owners get nothing out of the deal except getting the creditors off their backs? Don't they get the company taken away from them and distributed/reorganized on behalf of the creditors? So where's the profit? You plunk down $XXX to buy the company and have $0 when it is bankrupt. That looks like a loss to me, but since I'm just a dumb businessman, I am not smart enough to figure out these things like a Democrat does.
I do know of the practice where somebody buys a company and sells part of the assets to help finance the purchase. That's called 'Greenmail' which is considered sharkish. The word is a play on the term blackmail which means betrayal. As far as I can tell, greenmail and blackmail have nothing to do with alternative energy or race. Although there certainly are voters who feel betrayed when the government gives a green company tax dollars which it loses on the way to bankruptcy. Which reminds me, Mr. President, if Solyndra and those 11 other companies we poured money into which went bankrupt and laid off all their employees, actually made profit for the government, then I'm expecting a tax rebate. And a smart guy like you could really talk about this.
But even if Mr. Romney sold assets, money from the sale would have to be held in the company treasury. So then if the debt gobbled up that money and exceeded the value of the company causing bankruptcy, that would leave a broke Romney. So if he made a gazillion dollars, it stands to reason that he actually did turn around some businesses--likely a lot of businesses. Money doesn't lie. But of course a business can be still succeed even if only 2/3 of the bets it makes come out positive. And Mitt probably made some bad bets. On the other hand, it seems to me, that government can be wrong all the time and still come out winning if it lies and manages to convince enough people. Isn't this true? I mean, that's all I know about it. But you've been in government almost all the time, like most Democrats, so you'd be the one to answer that.
So if you can just tell us how Romney gets rich by going broke, we the people would really love to hear it. Because there are a lot of us out here who have the talent to go broke, even when we are trying to avoid it. But you understand we're pretty dumb. We still haven't figured out how guys like Charles Rangel got fabulously wealthy when he never had a job except congressman. Or how the lawyers who handle bankruptcies are the only ones who seem to get rich. Is that what Democrats call being smart?
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Monday, May 21, 2012
Christianity & Gay Marriage
Are we back to this Same Sex Marriage thing again? Ugh! I fear that Christians won't win this one politically since so many people pick and choose beliefs from a Christian heritage and mix it with some pop psychology. Voila! They fashion themselves close followers of Christianity but vote against the Faith. Cal Thomas has written a fairly good column about this in Obama's Other Gospel but he gets all wrapped up in heresy and orthodoxy and practices of the Catholic Church. I'd like to do it Protestant-style--straight from the Inspired Word.
Do you believe in Jesus? Well, here's what my Lord and Savior and Friend said about marriage,
"Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female and said, 'Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife and the two shall become one flesh'?" Matthew 19:4-5 (bold added in case you don't see the point.) "One flesh" refers to procreation that is one flesh out of two individuals. When my Boss tells me such things, I tend to accept it.
The word Jesus uses for "hell" in the gospels is "Gehanna" which refers to the sight of a pagan Canaanite temple in the Kidron valley where Jerusalem dumped their trash. The City Dump, Gehanna, burned day and night as trash was added. The razzed temple was for the pagan god Molech in which Canaanites sacrificed their firstborn children. The way this was accomplished was through an intensely hot furnace into which the babies were thrown. Molech's Babylonian name was Bel and that's where Shadrack, Meshack and Abednigo were thrown. Now if you think that the act of throwing an innocent newborn into a furnace is something no one who is a parent could bring themselves to do, you are exactly right. All the priests of Molech were homosexual men.
And yet I hear people say repeatedly that Jesus never said anything about being gay or 'gay marriage'.
In Ephesians 5:25,32 it says, "Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that He might sanctify her...This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church." In those intervening verses, Paul is quoting that famous Genesis passage that Jesus quoted about a man and a woman becoming one flesh and his point is that marriage is a sacred contract, not a loose bond. And he is admonishing men to love their wives and wives to respect their husbands--a phenomenal understanding of man's and woman's (not 2 gays) neglected virtues you wouldn't expect from an old bachelor like Paul. (Proof number 161 that this Word is Inspired)
In Levitius 18 God tells the nation of Israel not to behave like Egyptians or Canaanites-- no incest, no marrying sisters, no homosexual relations, no child and human sacrifice and several other things He despises. vs. 28: "lest the land vomit you out when you make it unclean, as it vomited out the nation [Canaan] that was before you." Pretty strong words! Evidently the Boss doesn't go for such things.
Okay, so the Lord of my life said it is one man and one woman (not two women and a dog and a parakeet), a sacred trust, thinks of Hell's demons and gay priests in the same thought (and He has seen Hell where I haven't) and is strongly against even gay practice, do you expect me to vote for gay marriage? Besides, I don't like being vomited out.
Do you believe in Jesus? Well, here's what my Lord and Savior and Friend said about marriage,
"Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female and said, 'Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife and the two shall become one flesh'?" Matthew 19:4-5 (bold added in case you don't see the point.) "One flesh" refers to procreation that is one flesh out of two individuals. When my Boss tells me such things, I tend to accept it.
The word Jesus uses for "hell" in the gospels is "Gehanna" which refers to the sight of a pagan Canaanite temple in the Kidron valley where Jerusalem dumped their trash. The City Dump, Gehanna, burned day and night as trash was added. The razzed temple was for the pagan god Molech in which Canaanites sacrificed their firstborn children. The way this was accomplished was through an intensely hot furnace into which the babies were thrown. Molech's Babylonian name was Bel and that's where Shadrack, Meshack and Abednigo were thrown. Now if you think that the act of throwing an innocent newborn into a furnace is something no one who is a parent could bring themselves to do, you are exactly right. All the priests of Molech were homosexual men.
And yet I hear people say repeatedly that Jesus never said anything about being gay or 'gay marriage'.
In Ephesians 5:25,32 it says, "Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that He might sanctify her...This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church." In those intervening verses, Paul is quoting that famous Genesis passage that Jesus quoted about a man and a woman becoming one flesh and his point is that marriage is a sacred contract, not a loose bond. And he is admonishing men to love their wives and wives to respect their husbands--a phenomenal understanding of man's and woman's (not 2 gays) neglected virtues you wouldn't expect from an old bachelor like Paul. (Proof number 161 that this Word is Inspired)
In Levitius 18 God tells the nation of Israel not to behave like Egyptians or Canaanites-- no incest, no marrying sisters, no homosexual relations, no child and human sacrifice and several other things He despises. vs. 28: "lest the land vomit you out when you make it unclean, as it vomited out the nation [Canaan] that was before you." Pretty strong words! Evidently the Boss doesn't go for such things.
Okay, so the Lord of my life said it is one man and one woman (not two women and a dog and a parakeet), a sacred trust, thinks of Hell's demons and gay priests in the same thought (and He has seen Hell where I haven't) and is strongly against even gay practice, do you expect me to vote for gay marriage? Besides, I don't like being vomited out.
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Woody
July
14 is the 100th birthday of Woody Guthrie and as we go into this
Memorial Day-to-July4 time you are likely to hear about this repeatedly in the
media. Moreover, Guthrie is likely to be
treated as heroic, which leaves me a bit bemused. Born in Okemah in Okfuskee county (You’re a
true Okie if you can pronounce that quickly and show it on a map.) He died of
untreated Huntington’s disease in 1967, which causes dementia and absurd
behavior. An avowed communist, the Communist
Party USA wouldn’t accept him since he was a loose cannon. He became famous as the “Troubadour of the
Dustbowl” when he went on a cross-country trip with some Oklahoma farmers
trying to relocate in San Joaquin Valley and wrote many songs about it. Because of his music, the notion was
encouraged that Okies fled in mass to California during the dust bowl (an
enormous factual error), but with Steinbeck’s book it became ingrained in the
national consciousness and if you try to argue the facts people will dispute
you like you are a traitor to Well-known Facts About America. He went on to produce ballads full of blues for
the FDR propaganda films that were used to argue that Western Oklahoma, Texas
and Kansas should be made into a
national grasslands and the people run off the land. Such was progressivism. But I could never understand where
progressivism had any progress. Woody also wrote 174 columns for the communist
party newspaper, Daily Worker. Later he
sired 8 kids from 3 women and had a terrific wanderlust leaving families
behind. He eventually went to New York City where he was heralded as a true
down-to-earth American from Oklahoma, unlike most of the other communists
there.
He
is best known for ‘This Land Is Your Land’ a catchy tune and I-love-America
lyrics. The story of how this song came
about is an eye-roller of irony. Woodrow
Wilson Guthrie wrote the song in 1940 as an asinine spoof of “God Bless America”. A communist atheist, he naturally hated both
the lyrics and Kate Smith, the Songbird of the South who later sang it as a
patriotic moment during World War II. So
he wrote a sarcastic cynical ballad in which he borrowed the tune from a popular
Christian gospel song sung by the Carter Family at the time. To which he wrote lyrics about how awful
capitalist America was and then ended with the refrain “God blessed America for
me.” They were lyrics of how common people were routinely exploited and the
system was rotten. Not exactly a good
song for the patriotic nation in WW II.
Finally in 1944 he published it and no one noticed. After protesting the draft, then serving a
short stint in the merchant marine, he returned from the war and found his dust
bowl fame had disappeared. His career
started going downhill.
Then
in 1951 he got a chance to do a gig on a children’s television program. Television was a fledgling industry. And Guthrie wanted to sing God Blessed
America for Me. The producer of the show
listened and gagged. How could he sing
lyrics like this for children?
As I went walking, I saw a sign there,
And on the sign there, It said
"Private Property."
But on the other side, it didn't
say nothing!
That side was made for you and
me.
(You can see how ole’ Woody loved property rights.)
In the squares of the city, In the shadow of a steeple;
By the relief office, I'd seen my people.
As they stood there hungry, I stood there asking,
Is this land made for you and me?
The show director demanded Guthrie change the refrain. Change it or don’t do the gig. Woody needed money so he changed it. In keeping to those verses above he changed
it to “This land is made for you and me”
as a postive expression. But the director still choked over the lyrics continued to press Woody to change verses
until, with the above two verses deleted, it sounded like an inane song of love
of country.
This land is your land
This land is my land
From California to New York Island
From the Redwood Forests, to the
Gulf Stream waters
This Land was made for you and me.
Guthrie recorded it that way but
hated it. It caught on, made him famous, but he hated performing it. For he was
a writer of protest songs. Today it
stands as his singular work, a song with lyrics he was forced to write and tune
set to a gospel song he plagiarized and detested.
I keep
thinking irreverently, “maybe that’s what drove him crazy.”
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
He's done
I
don’t see it. I've been a campaign manager and I don’t see how Obama can
win—aside from a stunning Romney problem like John Edwards. Barack
won in 2008 by 53-46%. Hmmm—same
margin as my candidate did. That’s not a
comfortable margin. If you lose 3%
you’re tied. All right, let’s run some
numbers. Afro-Am’s are 10% of the vote
and they favored him by 95% last time.
He’s polling at 85% now. There
goes one percent. Hispanics are just
over 10% and they favored him by 75% last time.
They are 55% now. That’s another
2%. Young voters under 30 favored him
66% last time and make up an uncertain 10% of votes. They are now at 48% approval and what if only
half of them show up this time through discouragement. There’s at least another 2%. He’s down 12% with women who comprise 50% so
that’s -6%. Down 20% with elders over 55
and that’s 30% of the vote so that’s another minus 6%.
Of
course there is a lot of overlap in many categories, but you get the picture
that he’s about 10 points down from last time and the yo-yoing between 42 and
48% approval demonstrates this. Only
Rasmussen does polls of likely voters (at this time of the campaign) and they have been showing
numbers of about 45-45 all spring. Those
10% undecideds will go ¾ to the challenger.
All those other polls where they show 49-48% are blue-sky guesses since
they just interview people at random. 1
out of 3 of them won’t vote.
Obummer
has made bad strategic decisions in his campaign like his allegation that R’s
hate women, refusing to approve Keystone, looking like he doesn’t want to work
but golf while his wife travels to 5-star hotels on the taxpayer’s nickel. The attacks on rich and Wall Street have made
the public roll their eyes. His EPA is,
in the eyes of most people, somewhere between a bureaucratic concern and a Gestapo. No issue he brings up seems to get traction.
Republicans
made mistakes too. They couldn’t find a
true and articulate unanimous conservative. They
keep talking as if the recession is still going and it has been over for 3
years. If they had said the truth, this
is only the third jobless recovery in American history, which performs like the sick man of Europe, the charge would be
sticking to Oblamer like a tar baby. But
I figure Mitt has the discipline to talk economy all the way to the election
and all the diversionary tactics of BHO will not get him flustered. Obama defends unpopular policies of Obamacare,
refusal to drill or mine, and foreign policy appreasement. Stick a fork in him,
he’s done.
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Hands across the Convention
The
day started and ended well. It’s just
the in-between that made you bite nails.
Steve and I attended the Walk For Life that began in the park. He was the Send-off speaker and we had a
great time visiting with many of the folks.
8 pastors were there for a great fund-raiser. Salvation Army Chaplain Mike had a wonderful
story about a small boy trapped in a high window of a burning house. No one knew what to do until a man climbed an
iron pipe up the side of the wall and rescued him. But the pipe was so hot he burned his
hand. Moral: Love is costly. I was reminded of the interconnectedness of
Christians by all the fun we had visiting.
Then
we were off to the Republican convention in Norman. Steve had called the day before and asked if
we would still be seated as delegates if we came in late. The answer was ‘yes’ but when we arrived Pam
Pollard told us we would have to raise a point of order in the meeting and the
convention would have to let us in.
Political parties have strict rules about attendance and
credentials. Otherwise you could have
some outfit flash mob the place and disrupt.
We have enough controversy as it is without Occupy Norman showing up. It was nearly noon and Governor
Fallin finished speaking. The
credentials report was next. Turned out
that the convention floor wasn’t in the mood to seat Steve and I and some other latecomers so we shrugged and
decided to enjoy the day as spectators. We always
intend to have fun. So we sat in the
back next to Representative Dennis Johnson and Steve Fair of the Stephens
county delegation. Our Kay county folks
were across the aisle. Sitting there in
the cheap seats we were continually visited by others like George Faught who is
running for a bigger House—the US House seat in Eastern OK— Rep. Jason
Murphy and others.
The
Ron Paul folks are very intense about his candidacy and they arrived in
force far greater than the Paul vote percentage in OK's primary. First vote was to change the
rules so that the slate of delegates to the national convention would be
opposed by an alternate slate drawn up by the Paulistas. The majority of the convention opposed this
by a vote of about 800 to 500. But there
were computer problems with 6 counties, who had more voting delegates than the
computer screen at the front of the room showed. Kay had 23 voters and only 22 delegates. “Whassa deal?” I asked Lowell. "Did we pick up a Chicago Democrat who has
been out to the graveyard copying names?”
Turned out that someone in registration line had punched the “guest”
button instead of “delegate” so it was all innocent. But the 2 big counties, Tulsa and Oklahoma
had 20 or 30 folks unaccounted for. It
wouldn’t have made a difference in the vote results, but the Paul people had a fit, not
willing to go down to defeat so easily.
They had to re-certify the counties by hand and that took eternity. Steve and I were getting hungry. We used up my two granola bars and all the
candy kisses he could find in his suit coat pockets and down in the lining and
what-not. Of course that wasn’t
sufficient for us two fat boys. Dennis,
who also shares this trait, told somebody that if we had a famine he intended
to be the last man standing, and Steve would be second to last.
Pam
and Jeff and Matt, our fearless state party folks were trying to do their best
to get things rectified, and really held up well under the threats from the
floor. So too did Mark who was the chair
and the parliamentarian who really knew the rules front-to-back, but that only
aggravated the Ron Paul folks. One young
guy with a full beard and long hair stood up and gave a passionate demand of
why voting had to be perfect. Good Point. Steve said to me, “Did Jesus show up to tell
us how it should be done?” I told him that that the Democrat Convention always
mistakes Jesus and his disciples for Robin Hood and his merry men. The vote was eventually upheld but by now a
fist fight had broken out between two guys in the back corner and did that ever get
attention of the house! Every cell phone
camera was running. Don’t tell me
Oklahoma doesn’t have cock fights.
Finally at 2:30 we had a lunch recess.
Steve said, “you can see how so many people died on the Titanic—when people
get cross and start arguing.” Fair and
Johnson agreed. I have always heard that
the Republicans on the Titanic saw the fiscal
iceberg coming. The Democrats said there
was no iceberg or if there was they bitched and whined about it not being big
enough.
Back
from lunch at 3, we voted on the state slate.
It was another long vote, same results, and thus OK will now have a
state delegation at the National Convention. But there were all sorts of angry attempts at
amendment. The chair turned many down
flat which really got some in the crowd whompin' and stompin' and mad enough to fight snakes.
They were yelling “tyrant” and similar unrepeatable things. But we had 2 hours until the hotel had to
have the rooms for weddings. The vote on
a state chairman was next. Steve Fair
was a candidate and I leaned over and said, “Now if you win, don’t be like
Vaughan, here. He danced around and got
all excited at his watch party and his neighbor asked me if I’d ever seen a guy
get so excited about a $38,000 a year job?
Fair was kinda biting his nails and he got a huge kick of relief out of
that remark. Well, by golly, he won. Couldn’t have happened to a better guy, who
has built the Republican party almost from nothing down in Stephens County over
the last 30 years and given us good ideas to do in Kay and Osage.
With
those two drop-dead necessities done, we were free to consider platform items
and the Paulistas were loaded and ready.
Trouble was, we were out of time and the hotel staff was ready to set up
walls for their weddings. Platform items
can be taken up at State Party meetings later, but the Ron Paul people were fit
to be tied. So the movement to adjorn
was passed over a pandemonium of protests.
They poured out into the parking lot to try to convene their own “convention
in exile”, vowing to elect their own slate of delegates and a platform. Ugh. I have seen this happen with churches
too. A church is an organization with
doctrines and beliefs where people disagree and sometimes vehemently. But it is held together by a glue of shared
relationships with God which spawns relationships with each other. Same for a political party. We have issues we believe passionately. But we also have relationships. If you don’t have both, you fail. That’s why a chaotic convention is bad. Relationships break down temporarily. And yet we have a common goal of getting rid
of Benito Obama. I'll save my passion for that.
So
Mr. Steve got hungry and while I was watching the bedlam, he was on his iphone
finding a good place to eat.
Crackerbarrel at 122nd exit.
The word was passed and we rendezvoused there for dinner. There we became family again, thinking about
the re-election, planning our strategy and not mentioning the convention. Things get fun again when you are with family.
We don't all agree but are willing to work toward a common goal and we trust one another.
Sorry,
didn’t finish the story. The little boy was
the sole survivor of the fire, and the town was trying to decide who could take
him in. Perhaps they could send him to a
boys ranch where he would be free to run and play. Or maybe to a good boarding school where he
could learn. Then suddenly at the door a
man appeared, dropped to one knee and held out his arms. The boy immediately knew who it was because
the man had scars on his hands from the burning pipe.
He ran into the waiting arms.
Which is the story of us. “But Zion said, ‘the
Lord has forgotten me.’… Can a woman forget her nursing child and have no
compassion on the firstborn of her womb?
Yes, even these may forget, but I will not forget you. See, I have inscribed
you on the palms of My hands.” Isaiah 49:14-16
Friday, May 11, 2012
Mean Mitt
How
does that Monty Python thing go? “Help,
help! I’m being repressed!” (when the
peasant digging peat gets pounded by Arthur who can’t afford a horse) There’s a
believer in democracy everywhere you go.
Don’t
tell me Obama isn’t shrewd politically.
He made an announcement about supporting gay marriage and it fell
flat. So immediately his crew sent out a
half-bogus story about Mitt bullying a gay student in high school. If your original strategy doesn’t work, change
the subject.
A
few thoughts about picking on candidates for what they did as minors: Women have ¼ the muscle mass of men and talk
4 times as many words per day. Thus they
usually flee violence since it ruins relationships and they would be on the
losing end of a physical contest.
Teenage girls hurl insults right and left if they get in a fight, but
usually don’t swing. The same behavior can be
observed in nature. Females of a species
often flee, then send out verbal warnings, and then when they do have to fight,
fight with no-holds-barred, to-the-death to protect their young.
Males
on the other hand fight physically all the time. Practically every high school guy picked on
someone at some time and was picked on himself.
Fights erupted and somebody got beat up or at least slugged. It's kind of a sport, that guarantees to draw a crowd. The constant fighting helps develop
competitiveness and to understand their own power. Men are supposed to be
dangerous but controlled. But guys
practice aggression under strict rules of engagement. It starts young with boys
arguing about rules of wrestling or football that last longer than the actual
fights last themselves. Physical
fighting teaches men something. It
teaches that there must be boundaries or there will be bad consequences. But mostly it teaches you to resort to
violence at last resort. Else you might
get beat up. Thus it is that men
ardently write the laws and the Declaration of Independence and the
Constitution.
And
so most of us are a bit bemused at the allegation that mild-mannered Mitt was a
toughie. “If that’s true,” I can hear
one of my friends who was a big tough guy in high school say, “then he sure has
reformed.” And that is said with
admiration of character in mind. Now realistically,
it sounds like the story of Mitt as Aggressor has been embellished with
politics in mind. Likely he wasn’t so
mean. But whatever he did as a kid was
likely a good lesson that changed his character. The only guys we note for their meanness are
the adults who never learned to be measured and stable. Those are the guys with mug shots on the
nightly news. That's Khruschev pounding the table with his shoe.
So
here’s my prediction. When the story has
played itself out, Mitt will gain support among men. We understand what’s going on and who among
us would like our own childhood dissected by the media. Whether Mitt gains support among women depends
on how he comes across, as a nerdy but lovable guy who can put us back on the
right track or the evil demon the Dems make him out to be.
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Half breed
Two
weeks ago B. Hussein Obama said that he was not going to question his
opponent’s patriotism. And then this
week he did just that with his ad about how Romney wouldn’t have gone after
Osama. It surely reminded me of how he
wasn’t going to make abortion or reproductive rights part of the campaign and
then a couple days later he started the baiting of the Catholic church by making
it plain to them that they would have to pay for birth control and
abortafaciants, Fluke and all. Does this
not show what kind of a campaign this is going to be? Making such ‘high road’ statements and then
dropping a bomb doesn’t just show hypocrisy.
It shows a real eagerness for mudslinging. Disclaimer: when I suggested that, due to his
penchant for taking over the auto companies, and all my friends saying he was
really a Muslim, that his nickname could be Carbama, I did not realize what a
bomb-thrower he was going to be. So I am
not responsible.
Listening
to Rush on Friday, I think he was getting pretty edgy with his fun again. He was laughing about Elizabeth Warren’s
gaffe about being Indian because she was 1/32 and using her minority status to
get a dinner invite when she was at Haw-vud. He selected an old Cher favorite,Halfbreed, as a theme song. I haven’t heard that song in about 40 years,
remembered the words and began laughing not only at his skewering of Diversity,
but laughing at myself for having liked that song. The
Indians said I was white by law. The
white men always called me, Indian Squaw.
I guess that song captured the angst and anger of youth which
pre-emptively blames an adult world for failure on Unfairness and Racism. I
suppose I was more liberal in those days. Half
Breed! ‘She’s no good’ they warned. Too bad we still have one party that
uses Unfairness and Racism and teenage thinking to get voters. The songwriter eventually blames her love
life and all else on being mixed race. But
you get older and realize things never were as you imagined. America is a pretty mixed race place. I read a series of papers that were meeting
notes of the Nazis and Japanese at the beginning of WW II. The thing both agreed upon was that if
America entered the war, it was a nation of “mongrels and mixed races” that naturally
fought with each other. Thus USA would
be easy to defeat. Then came the
windtalkers. Then came the patrician
general Patton who asked a bunch of Texas farmers to make suggestions about the
Sherman tank. They gave him a host of
critiques about where grease zerks needed to be and certain parts needed to be
redesigned “else you’d wait forever for parts’.
That done, the Sherman became a rapid-manufacture tank that “any farm
kid could fix and any city kid could drive.” The mongrels found no trouble allying with
every nation against the Axis powers and Ike held them together like determined
brothers. Instead of a patsy, the Nazis
found a juggernaut.
We always moved around
from town to town/ When you’re not wanted, you don’t hang around. Perhaps the Halfbreed songwriter really did experience such prejudice, but I
doubt it was long-lasting or in Oklahoma.
I was doing research on Indian numbers for one of the elderhostel
classes I taught for OU. I came across
evidence that totally destroys the racist narrative. The US Army has kept very thorough notes on frontier
incidents since colonial times. The sum
of all Native Americans killed in all skirmishes, ambushes, disagreements, and
wars totals about 79,000. But the census
of 1900 for the first time asked about ethnic background and found 200,000 full
bloods and over a million people were “partial Indian”. Now if you are ‘partial’ that means you had a
mixed marriage in your ancestry. Thus there
were at least 10 times as many romances going on as killings. (roughly 1/3 of Oklahomans
are part native American.) So I asked my
blonde housekeeping assistant at the hotel (who was on the Ponca Tribal
Council) if she knew anybody with a romance story about Cowboys and
Indians. She gave a grin as wide as the
Salt Fork River and sat down to tell me the stories of her grandparents on both
sides. Gee, that didn’t take long! Boy meets girl at trading post stuff.
One
story was humorous. Some Indian fathers
were eager to marry their daughters to settlers since the cowboys treated the
girls well (that Western notion called “romance”) and the family got a heads-up
on new ways of the white people with a son-in-law. Ah, so Carolyn’s grandmother’s cowboy asked
Papa for her hand and secured a dowry and the girl was so darned mad she wouldn’t
talk to anyone. This dismayed both her
father and her fiancé. Finally they
figured it out. A good woman was worth 3
horses in Ponca dowry, but the poor cowboy had only two. Bride was insulted. But the poor cowboy sat her down and told her
he really loved her and was terribly disappointed because he wanted her to wear
his sister’s wedding dress and get married in the Methodist church. Suddenly she flew into his arms and all was
forgiven. Because Indian girls used to
hide behind trees from a distance and envy the white girls getting married in
the gown, and the cake, and the dance—well, you understand. Now in their 80’s,
health of the old farm couple was getting bad and so Carolyn had come home to
take care of them.
The
genius of America is that you can be what you want to be. The genius of Oklahoma is that they poured a
whole bunch of mixed people together and it still works, maybe works better. So when this campaign gets nasty with the race allegations from the left, just roll your eyes and laugh.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)