The “lobbying problem” starts with
our First Amendment. Amazingly, A1 is
known to schoolchildren and most adults as the free speech amendment. But there are 6 rights spelled out in
A1. The phrase not to “abridging the
right of free speech” is just one of them. The last two are, “or the right of
people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of
grievances.” So get your shoes on and go to Washington to plead your case. What? No time to do this? Join the club. So your petitioning rights may be handed to
the different organizations you belong to.
Your union, church, farm organization, environmental group, tax policy
advocates, etc. They have professionals,
otherwise known as lobbyists or advocates, who spend time with lawmakers
petitioning the government in your behalf.
To take away the lobbying rights or limit them violates the First Amendment. Dictatorships have no lobbyists.
Lobbyists do more and less than most
people realize. They not only sway with
arguments and ply with charm. They write
a lot of our legislation. Do you think
Senator Foghorn writes his own 2700-page bills?
He has neither time nor inclination.
Instead, organizations that ally with him often hand him a bill and ask
his authorship. Not conforming to this
model is how the Rep I work with got attention in our legislature. He wrote a lot of his own bills. They were
simple and common sense and they passed.
But while lobbyists have such power due to legislators who are busy with
the public, they are also less than they seem.
Legislators often toss their messages in the trash can. Have you ever gotten a loud email asking you
to forward a pre-prepared message to your congressman? And so you and 2000 others sent that same
message to your Rep. No doubt his staff
gave him one copy and then rolling their eyes, deleted the rest of the
forwards. If you want to reach your Rep
with communication, sit down and construct a thoughtful letter yourself. Personally authored stuff gets the first
attention. Also the noise, brought by
the news media, about corruption of lobbyists and legislators is often a lot of
alarmist screech. The media wants to be sole or at least the main petitioner of
government. Lobbyists and lawmakers have
strict rules about behavior and rarely do they transgress because the penalties
involve prison. Does anyone ever put the
news media in prison for publishing/broadcasting false stuff?
Bottom line: people who peaceably
assemble in organizations to advocate for what they want are both necessary in
a free society as are their lobbyists and the listening ear of elected
officials.
Money in politics also gets a lot of
trash talk. Ever try to get yourself
elected with no funds? It takes money and a lot of it to get the public’s
attention. At least half the public
isn’t paying attention and can’t name the Vice President or their two
Senators. This is how a republic is
designed to work despite a lot of bozo voters.
In a true democracy, every little decision requires a referendum and all
voters must be highly informed lest a disastrous decision is voted. But in a republic we trust our attention to
governing to dedicated individuals we elect. It works somewhat; even at that we
get Obamacare. Money buys attention and is equated to political speech by the Supreme
Court. The news media hates this. They want to be the only source of
information to steer your vote.
It takes a larger amount of money to
do direct mail, newspaper/radio/tv ads, campaign signs, tours by the candidate
with staff, and the staffing to win a large state-wide election. It takes an average $1.2 million to win a
congressional district and about $10 million to win a state election. Chuckle point: Dems who pontificate against
big money in politics have the 5 highest donors. #6 is the Republican Koch brothers—who use
about 10% of their funds to support moderate Democrats.
The problem isn’t that money has
gotten into politics but politics has gotten into money. The feds spend almost
$4 trillion each year, regulating businesses to favor some and clobber others
into various political outcomes. If your
business organization doesn’t spend liberally, Big Government will start doing
things to you that makes success doubtful or even puts you out of
business. Likewise other businesses try
to buy favor and get government projects while disadvantaging competitors. It’s a huge game. If the game weren’t huge, it wouldn’t attract
the money. The solution is to downsize government, not the economy. Restrict government, not business. And the influence of lobbyists will then
decline.
No comments:
Post a Comment