Let me see
if I can explain in man-in-the-street terms the lawsuit OK has going against
Obamacare.
The
Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare) specifically states that the federal
government can only give subsidizes (in the form of tax credits) if the state
has set up an exchange. Oklahoma
declined to set up an exchange. But
Obama says that the feds will do it anyway once they set up a federal exchange
within the state. Attorney General
Pruitt objected saying that the federal government cannot do this since it is
forbidden by the Act.
So why did
OK decline? The answer is that the feds
learn of a business not providing health care if an employee applies for a
subsidy with an exchange. The employer
gets socked with a $2000 penalty. But
there may be many reasons for an employee applying. The employer may carry insurance but not what
the employee wants. The employee may do
it out of stupidity. Or he might do it
fraudulently. Medicare and Medicaid have
some of the highest fraud rates of any government program. Some state show 20+% of payments are
fraudulent. And considering the latest Obamacare
deadline postponement with people being asked an unaccounted income, is almost
certain to create massive fraud. So what
happens if your $90,000 employee goes into an exchange and swears he makes
$25,000 a year in order to get a huge subsidy rather than paying half the
premium at work?
The upshot
is that businesses get hammered with penalties and often will be hammered
unfairly. It would kill a state’s economy and may play havoc with certain
industries. That is why 34 states
decided to not do exchanges and only 16 very blue states decided to play along
with Obamacare. And so Pruitt v.
Sibelius moves along it’s path to the Supreme Court. Holder tried to argue in another case that
since the business mandate was being postponed, the lawsuit should also be
postponed. The 4th Circuit
Court last week slammed this idea saying that it had become even more
imperative to have a decision on Pruitt.
It could
get interesting. If OK wins, Obamacare,
if not dead is mortally wounded.
Interesting. I wonder if 'Red State' AGs perhaps should receive more credit for their efforts.?.?.? Like the somewhat more succinct article.
ReplyDelete