Christopher Columbus has been so reviled and lauded over the years—what’s the truth? He was controversial in his own time and with America’s founding fathers, but for entirely different reasons that are being forwarded today. Modern critiques are that he brought racism, colonialism, disease and capitalism to the Americas. The ‘colonial charge’ is correct, but that was practiced by virtually every developed society from China to Europe. The disease charge is correct but who would allege that Eurasians and Americans would have never met. They were bound to meet and Eurasian diseases would spread at some time. Some say he brought capitalism. Ironically, neither he nor Spain was capitalist but quite statist.
One cannot understand Columbus
without understanding the world in his era. The Black Death struck Europe in 1347 and
returned every generation thereafter.
1/3 the population died. People
had a sense of doom and predicted the end of the world was near. Europe was locked in a death struggle with
Islam’s states and it looked like Islam would obliterate Europe when
Constantinople fell in 1453. Trade with
China and India came to a halt, and desperation led to innovation. But had it not been for a newly invented Muslim ship that could turn and tack easier, the caravel, a voyage across the Atlantic would have been nearly impossible. The later innovation of stronger stiffer hulls of galleons allowed larger ships. The Portugese, a small country, envious of
rich Italian merchants and Spanish warriors, began to explore for islands
offshore of Africa to literally move population if the Islam came. Indeed they
found Madeira and Azores, causing Spain to try the same thing and they
discovered Canary Islands. Columbus, born in 1451 was of middle class Genoa
where he became a master seaman and influenced by Travels of Marco Polo and Travels
of John Mandeville (Christian author who wanted the Faith to expand
geographically). He was ambitious and wanted a title, the only way to become
wealthy in those days. When he heard of Portugal’s exploits, he proposed a
daring trip to secure a route to China by sailing west. Everyone knew the world wasn’t flat (contrary
to Washington Irving’s fiction) but two estimates of its size were argued. Columbus chose the smaller. Sly dog, King
Joao II of Portugal, turned him down and used Colombus’ plan to commission his
own fleet under Fernao de Ulma. Columbus
would be a footnote in history had not bad weather turned de Ulma back in
1490. In 1492, Spanish states defeated
Muslim Grenada and suddenly after 7 bloody centuries, Christianity controlled
the Iberian Peninsula. Ferdinand of Leon married Isabella of Castile and the
exultant Spanish then had one country which could turn its interests
elsewhere. Columbus saw his chance to
request a voyage. But Ferdinand rejected
him. Columbus was ready to leave and
pitch his plan elsewhere, England or France, but a friend bolstered his case
with Isabella and he won upon appeal. Much has been made about how pitiful his
ships were; Santa Maria was only 60
feet long and it ran aground in his first voyage. Yet they were state-of-the-art vessels. The crew was Spanish and this caused
dissention since Columbus was Italian.
Soon they questioned his judgment about going too far west to return safely.
Just in time to escape mutiny, Oct. 12, 1492, land was sighted although a reef,
probably Watling Island of Bahamas. They continued on guessing at currents and
birds until they found San Salvador naming it after our Savior, planted the
flag and left a small colony. A second trip brought a flotilla and he planted
colonies on several islands. The original settlers had been massacred by
natives.
In his salesmanship, he suggested
they would find gold. They found beans
instead. (How would you like to the be the first Spaniard to discover beans?”Oh,
Jose, I got all this gas!”) Columbus was a tremendous sailor who used ‘dead
reckoning’ of a compass, currents, clouds, and birds to find the new
world. He did not “sail by the stars” as
Polynesians did. Yet his nerve,
planning, and ability to sail 4000 miles and return to the same place 4 times
make him a premier captain. He was as
bad as governor as he was good at sailing. The Spanish soldiers of fortune he
left behind enslaved Indians that Columbus sought to make free subjects of
Spain (according to his letters) Today’s secular scholars also misunderstand
the strong role religion played. He was
criticized in his day by those who thought the natives should have converted
faster. One of his underlings, Bartolome
Las Casas, wanted to claim the credit and wrote at length of his boss’s
failure. Moderns like leftist Howard Zinn have used Las Casas to claim Columbus
was cruel and evil. Ironic because
Columbus was far less cruel than the cannibal Carib Indians he met, less than
the proud Spaniards who conquered the Moors.
Spain lorded it over the Tianos natives for material gain instead of
conversion. Columbus tried to reign in the opportunists, but the Spanish
encomienda system was a feudal plantation. Then the Tianos began to die of
diseases. Meanwhile, in Spain, Columbus,
the outsider didn’t get much of a title or credit in the Spanish court. He
always insisted he discovered India and died in 1506 after 4 voyages to the
Caribbean, Central and South America. Unwittingly, he postulated that Africans
might work well in the islands.
No comments:
Post a Comment