Confession time. My partner and I do a lot of risky
things. Not the skydiving and Alaskan
hunting sorts of things, but business risks.
Why? What makes us start a
B&B, 2 hotels, restaurant, catering service, limo service, rentals and
flips, Christmas Market Oklahoma, foster kids, and a number of other
things. I’m no great businessman. Only the hotels and rentals made a
sustainable living. But we laugh the failures off and say we survived to tell
about it. Even the system kid who pulled a knife and is now in prison.
Becoming a single parent at age 19, I read a
fair number of child psychologists--Dodson, Dobson, Spock and more recently
Eldridge. They say that kids who have a
stable family become people who take risks.
Don’t confuse this with gambling.
Gamblers are the guys who will spend a dollar on a lottery ticket simply
because it has a million dollar payoff.
Never mind the billion to one odds.
But if you offer people a $50 bill or the chance to win $120 with
two-to-one odds, most people will take the less risky route of 50 bucks. The fewer risk takers will opt for the
average payoff of $60.
When Eldridge explained so clearly that
having a family that encouraged you to try something new, that even bad mistakes can be overcome by intellectual
honesty, persistence, and discipline, it gave me pause. So then what is in store for USA as our
social fabric disintegrates? Will children
raised by single parents (or more realistically by a gang of peers), will abuse
and neglect and bullying and government schools cause us to become a nation
that no longer takes much risk? It seems to be coming true. I find a spiritual component to risk as
well. If God care for you, is in the
process of making your life worth something he planned, then go for it.
Indeed, USA has gone from economic growth of
4.5% in the eighties, to 3.5% in the 90s to 3% in the 2000s to 1.8% in the big recovery
last year. Risk-taking has been disturbingly
scarce in America of late: the number of self-employed, job creation at
start-ups and the sums invested in businesses have been low. The rich and educated have always been more
daring. But then you find out they got
that way by living on the edge more. Comes
now a growing body of economic research that links low tolerance of risk with
past emotional trauma (“from which there seems no escape”, the psychologists
would add). They have been studying personal
financial behavior of Europeans after their recession of the early 1990s,
tsunami survivors of 2004 in SE Asia, and Americans after 2007. The results are that people are much more
risk averse, even if they didn’t sustain personal loss. Another study of Italian banking students,
half of whom were shown a gory horror flick just prior to a test on risk, saw
significantly more cautious scores among those who watched the movie—except those
who love and laugh at horror movies.
All this makes sense to me since I hired onto
a major company in the seventies, whose bosses had grown up in the Depression
and fought in WW II. They didn’t
understand the new generation.
Traditionally, factories who had an assembly line worker who screwed
something up would punish the worker by making them take the day off. The traumatized employee returned fearful of
job loss the next day vowing to do better.
But when my generation came along and wanted a day off, the threw bolts
into the assembly conveyors on purpose. Temporary joblessnes was no punishment.
Management didn’t know how to deal with it.
I think I drove my bosses nuts. I would make goals to do what seemed very
hard at times and commit to doing whatever it took to finish it. The customers who were division offices
within our company loved such things, heralded the jobs, but back home it was
icy. I remember a boss closing the door
to my office and going ballistic over me promising too much. “You should never promise ANYthing! That way no one can say you didn’t achieve
something you promised! And your reputation follows you around. If you don’t make
waves you will get promoted.” Hmm. I read about Boone Pickens and why he quit
Phillips for exactly this kind of management.
I had to think about the invitation to become
a campaign manager. Politics is about
telling people what they want to hear, and I always took too much delight in
seeing the fallacy, the buffoonery, the pitfall, the opportunity in their assurance
of failure. Would I do okay? But at
least I didn’t have to do the talking and I had a guy who could. We muddled through and won. Now we laugh about how we survived when
everyone expected us to go up in smoke.
America has always confounded the critics by
succeeding where they could only foresee abject failure. Having supportive parents while just outside
the window was a world waiting to be conquered, was our secret weapon. Having a God who held us in the palm of His
hand and didn’t mind us floundering was our secret weapon. I just hope it is not so secret that we lose
it without ever knowing what it is that we lost.
No comments:
Post a Comment