With all the tiring drivel about Presidential politics, let’s look
at something closer to home. How is it
that the public worker and teacher pensions are going so far set? A recent economic paper by Andonov, Bauer and
Cremers shows the problem is when unaccountable public pension managers meet
federal rules they do dumb things, game the system. We the taxpayers and the retirees pay.
A pension
fund is a promise to pay out an income stream in the future—debt, if you
will. That’s how it works with your
annuities or a private pension.
Corporate bond yields or some other conservative measure is used to
discount future liabilities. As your
annuity or a pension fund matures and more people are at or near retirement, it
should be invested even more conservatively.
You don’t want your money to evaporate at age 70 when you can’t make it
back.
But public
pensions are allowed by the Government Accounting Standards Board to discount
their liabilities by the expected return on their assets. That means that the liabilities look
lower/better if expected earnings are guessed high. Guess/project 10% rather than 5% return and you only
have to put in half as much. Now with
public funds there are only 2 sources of funding—ask employees to contribute
more or soak the taxpayers. The first is
like going to war with the best funded unions on earth. The second is politically unpopular. So what to do? The public fund managers choose to project
in-your-dreams returns, thus making the liabilities look small and the fund
more solvent.
And what
happens when government bureaucrats invest aggressively to justify those
projections? They underperform private
pension investing by half a percent a year.
Thus, many states have pension funds with pitiful public pension
projections. This is why Illinois and
California are such basket cases in state finances. Oklahoma had 90 years of Democrats who had
the attitude of “Oh, we’ll just go raise taxes in the future.” The state still has $10 billion unfunded
liabilities for teachers and public workers.
But that’s down from $16B because COLAs have been forgone and other
funding has been found. (And new
teachers must live with defined contribution plans.) But the easy part is over. Either taxpayers will cough up or taxpayers
will tell retirees to live with less (about one-fourth less).
None of this is pleasant. And it
could have been avoided if GASB had not had special rules for public
pensions. That needs to change in the
future.
Excellent. Very enlightening.
ReplyDelete