As a
member of the boomer generation who watches the numbers, I have lived in a
world of utter disgust over the last 40 years watching Congress play Least
Greater Fool with the Social Security.
It was originally billed as a “savings plan” so that no one would go
into retirement without savings. In
reality, it is a ponzi scheme on the current workers to pay for those already
retired. Nonetheless, people pay into SS
and consider it their due. As well they
should. Because even if the government
had been putting away their ‘contributions’ (I love government-speak. Jist dem good ol’ SS troopers passing the
offering plate, ya’ know.) into federal bonds, it would have yielded at least 4
times as much upon retirement.
The cash flow of the SS is now
negative. In the last ten years, the SS
payout per working person has doubled, from $3000 to $6000 and will double in
another 6 years. Even so, the donkeys
still claim that the fund is perfectly fine and totally solvent. Not true. We must finally fix the system, or it will
begin to rapidly gobble up the national budget. (even if Dingy Harry doesn’t
pass one) An unfixed SS and MC will mean that within roughly 20 years, all the federal
government will have money to do is pay seniors. That’s a generational war I don’t want to be
part of. We need to fix this thing.
Here are several proposed solutions
that could fix the SS.
1. Raise retirement age—If you raise the
age to 72 it will fix SS in perpetuity.
2. Raise Taxes—if you triple payroll
taxes it will fix SS in perpetuity.
3. Raise the cap on payroll taxes—if you
raise the cap (currently about $110K) to a million, it will fix about half the actuarial
problem.
4. Means test—Just paying SS to the poor
could fix however much you wanted but to fix it for all times you’d have to deny
SS to about 1/3 of the middle class plus the upper class.
5. Cap and Gap—this means don’t change
the current cap but start re-collecting 6.2% on those over $250,000, i.e. soak
the rich. This fixes about half the
problem.
6. Collect SS on all incomes—Cap gains, 401K
distributions, dividends, etc. This
would come close to fixing the problem forever.
7. Cut benefits—again, if you are willing
to live with less than half the benefits, this could fix it.
Politically,
these are all hard to do. Dems bray like
jackasses if you bring up raising retirement ages or cutting benefits. They are keen on things like soaking the rich
with 3,5 or 6 or making SS a welfare program with 4. Republicans might agree to
a small portion of each of the above but would favor cutting COLA increases to
benefits first. I predict that Congress
won’t do major changes. They will just
jigger the numbers to kick the can down the road by 5 years. Thus the most likely fix is to raise the cap
on payroll taxes again. This pains the
least number of voters. (Same politics
as Adolf Hitler: pick on some numerically small group that can’t defend itself,
like Jew bankers, and put all the burden on them for failure. Or in this case, “the
rich”) The people who study the
insolvency problem say that the logical fix is #1, raise the age since 65 was
quite old when the system began. This
would also allow progressives to continue to say “this is your savings plan,
your insurance against getting old and having no savings.” That’s utterly logical, but it counters the progressive
plan to make as many people beholden to government as possible. And both pols
of both parties lament the squall of the citizenry. I hate to say this, but if you’ve been
working 50 years like I have, and haven’t planned for other income in
retirement, am I supposed to feel sorry for you, Mr. Grasshopper? Well, okay,
personally I might, but I don’t feel morally right in skewering the rest of the
taxpayers to make them liable for your behavior.
And considering all the solutions for
the government to soak the rich, do you think the rich got that way by being
stupid like the government? Will they
simply stand meekly to be fleeced or will they move accounts overseas, find
ways to make assets grow without realizing income, and use corporations to
expense things to support their lifestyle?
Hmm? Failure to realize this
gives rise to the story about Greece.
Greece spends $150 billion a year and collects taxes of $336 from the
last remaining taxpaying businessman in Athens who is planning to retire in
April.
At least with SS there is a defined
amount of benefits paid according to current law. With Medicare, the outgo per patient keeps
rising faster than inflation. It is for
this reason, I am convinced that Obama has folded MC into Obamacare and plans
to just not pay the bills for old folks.
The costs of average health insurance policies have gone up $3000 as
opposed to his prediction of $2500 savings from Obamacare. And since 30 million new insurees will show
up at insurance companies demanding insurance no matter what sickness they come
with, costs of your insurance will approximately double in the next few
years. Thus, I agree with Rep. Joe
Wilson. There is no way Obama could have
fooled himself into believing his own rhetoric.
Potential fixes for MC are
1. Raise payroll taxes—maybe 5X as much
as current 1.45% is needed, maybe more.
2. Cut benefits which means not paying
docs and hospitals or Death Panels ala Obamacare—“After age 65 you’ve had a
full life and we don’t pay for gall bladder surgery. Nor do we allow doctors to perform them. Here’s a pill for your pain.” You’ll have to
visit Malaysia to get that gall bladder removed.
All the
other fixes like SS has don’t work in the case of MC-- like giving benefits
only to the poor or soaking the rich (Rich are already taxed). Stunningly, the Dems favored cutting benefits
stealthily in Obamacare rather than raising taxes. This has consequences. Simply
not paying docs (in order to cut benefits) will only cause mass retirements
from medicine. Not paying hospitals will
kill hospital economics, especially in rural areas. And that means fewer docs
practicing in the hinterlands. Thus most
people will be forced to visit “urban clinics” with lesser skilled PA’s and
others dispensing medical care.
The way to fix MC and healthcare in
general is to repeal Obamacare and simply set up a healthcare assistance
program to partially subsidize healthcare for those with medical conditions
while using payroll deductions to mandate that they must purchase insurance. Annual cost of this would be $200 billion but
far less than Obamacare. The costs might go down to $130 billion if several
Republican initiatives could be enacted such as purchase of medical insurance
across state boundaries.
Whether this could happen remains to
be seen. So long as we have our present
medical system intact, it could be done.
Once half the docs retire and hospitals close, and Obamacare system gets
entrenched, it’s too late. Based on all
those years of watching SS, I’m not optimistic.
It will probably be just like the opportunity to easily fix SS years
ago--by allowing employees to designate a portion (20%) into a savings plan of
government bonds—has now gone by. It’s too late once the cash flow goes
negative.
The real fix is to have pols who are
satisfied with just one term and vow to do the RIGHT thing for our country’s future,
not the thing that gets them re-elected.
If you are young, I seriously suggest
that you learn to live on about 2/3 of your income and save the other third in
good investments. Thus you won’t be
dependent on Uncle Sugar. Because one of
these days the national credit rating will be downgraded from A to B to horse
manure upon discovery that the Grand Canyon and Yellowstone have been
repossessed by China. I averaged Lower-Middle
Income earnings for 20 years before retirement and managed to live on almost
poverty level expenses. Subsequent
investments promise a modest retirement at least. If I can do it so can you.
I know, I’m like that old cowpoke
who had to testify before Congress and they found him in Contempt of
Congress. He just said, “Wull, yeah.”
No comments:
Post a Comment