Conservatives
that win in liberal-land have a lesson to teach. Reagan twice was elected Gov of California by
large margins. Coburn won the Yellow Dog
Democrat 1st District of Eastern Oklahoma. Ryan wins his heavily Dem district by
66%. How do they do it?
Not all Dems are the sort of secular
progressives that the news media promotes or the leftists on the coasts think
the party should be. They still believe
in the social safety nets, want good government and don’t distrust it, and they
are patriotic. To people like these,
Reagan/Coburn/Ryan appeal because, though more conservative, they are willing
to promote realistic solutions with political courage. Secondly, they can explain their ideas in
plain talk.
I was sitting 10 feet away from Senator Tom
Coburn in his recent town hall when he got asked what he thought of the choice
of Ryan just the day after. The Senator
beamed, “He has moral courage.” And I could tell he thought of Ryan as a
kindred spirit. In his book, The Debt
Bomb, Coburn talks about how Washington is full of careerism on both sides
of the aisle. Everyone is interested in
hanging onto his seat in the next election more than actually doing something
courageous and leaderlike about the problems. (of debt and entitlements) So Conservatives talk a good act,
grandstanding to the conservatives back home, but won’t stand for anything
controversial. They spend like crazy on
earmarks and won’t touch the train wreck that is coming with the debt and with
Medicare. What sets Coburn and Ryan
apart is their willingness to stick their necks out for a possible solution,
put their name on the bill and, win or lose by the political result.
Nor do they compromise their beliefs much. While some pols pretend leadership by
compromising—John McCain, Arlen Spector come to mind—Ryan and Coburn seem to be
more on the lookout for areas where agreement can be had and are clever to use
that agreement. But because areas of
agreement between the parties is hard, the result can be misread as simply
compromise by those who are easy critics.
Ryan did this with his budget. His plan is slow to bring budget balance, but
it is workable politically. Then he did
a masterful job selling it to reluctant careerist Republicans by persuasion—and
getting think tanks and opinion writers to look at it and give their
blessing. Vision, strategic thinking
about how to get something done, persuasion of people who don’t have this thing
in mind at all are the signs of true leadership. Romney has such vision, and perhaps the
strategic thinking, but he isn’t terribly persuasive sometimes. He has 59 points to explain his rescue of the
economy when 3 would be better to explain.
Ryan is a brain with that rare ability to condense complex facts into
simple language. He is not Barack the
soaring rhetorician or a master of the emotions. Not a terribly dynamic speaker
but that only adds to his appeal of being ordinary Joe telling the emperor he
has no clothes (and by golly Paul Ryan knows where the clothes are, too). That’s why he appeals to crossover Democrats.
Coburn uses the same no-nonsense,
tell-it-like-it-is problem solving. He
caught guff from Conservative purists who didn’t like him signing onto
Simpson-Bowles. Tom shrugs and says it
was sure not to pass exactly as worded, but provided a desperately needed starting
point for fiscal sanity. No fiscal
sanity means the debt bomb will surely explode.
That is where we are in this election. If we don’t stop the deficit spending, the
international bond market will kill our credit in a rapid crash. And with that, our economy will lie in waste
for years, our social safety nets will become full of underfunded holes. And that breeds opportunistic tyrants like
stagnant water breeds mosquitoes. Yet
even if Romney and Ryan are elected there is no guarantee that the careerists
in Congress will be moved to stop the bleeding. The Senate which refuses to
pass a budget may continue under the Dems. Congress may get cold feet about
repealing Obamacare. There is much work
to be done. All I know is that it will
take someone heroic and willing to live or die by the politics of Moral
Courage.
No comments:
Post a Comment